Why I Don’t Wear Heels to Work Anymore– Guest Blogger Tracy Travaglio
March 20, 2018
Earlier this year, I quit wearing high heels to work. I wasn’t taking a stance on feminist values. I wasn’t suffering from back pain. I wasn’t trying to be less conspicuous, as I often “click-clack” down the hallway.
No, I wasn’t making a statement of any kind when I made the decision to forego my favorite three inch patent pumps.
I quit wearing high heels because I can’t run in them as easily as I can run in flats.
You see, I’m a high school teacher. Early on in the school year, my building was evacuated multiple times due to bomb threats. During each evacuation, I’d make sure I had my car keys (I learned the hard way during a bomb threat last year) before rounding up my wonderful homeroom students to make the trek up the hill to our district’s senior high school. As we all streamed out of the building together for the third time in two weeks, a relatively calm cascading clan unified by our collective exasperation, I quietly threw up a prayer of thanks that I had finally been prepared for this evacuation.
Earlier that week, we had all joked about our “evacuation kits.” Both teachers and students alike had made sure that they had packed accordingly each day, just in case another evacuation occurred. My “kit” included all of my keys, as well as protein bars, my cell phone charger, and my wallet. I also started to keep pens and paper in my schoolbag, just in case we’d need to take down the names of students who were being picked up or had been unaccounted for due to a poorly-timed trip to the nurse or restroom.
Though the bomb threats earlier in the school year had been idle and annoying, there have been a few school shooting threats this year that have been downright terrifying. There’s no feeling quite like walking into your place of employment the morning after someone has posted online that your building is going to be “shot up.” I’m so thankful our superintendent handles these threats quickly and with authority, but the thought always lingers: “It could happen here.”
With each new school shooting (how awful that that’s even a legitimate phrase to type), my awareness is heightened. After Sandy Hook, I started keeping a belt next to my door (to hold it shut), several carts towards the front of my room (to block the doorway), and class sets of textbooks of various sizes on my bookshelf (to use both as shields and as ammo to throw at an intruder). I’ve thought about every possible entrance/exit scenario in my building and where I’d take my students in case we’d have to make a run for it. Whether I pop over to my colleague’s room less than ten feet away or I head across the building during my hall duty, I make sure to always take my cell phone.
Being prepared has always been an important part of my profession. Teachers even have “prep periods,” when we can make copies, plan lessons, and grade papers. Teaching is not a job where employees can simply just “show up” and get to work. But over the last several years of my career, being prepared has taken on a completely different, unnerving meaning.
It has become part of my job to talk to my students about the “What if” scenarios involving a school shooter in our building.
It has become part of my job to be on the lookout for warning signs that one of my students could become the next school shooter.
It has become part of my job to keep my students quiet and calm during very realistic lockdown drills.
It has become part of my job to be able to identify the sound of bullets in my school building.
It has become part of my job to be able to protect my students while we run at a moment’s notice.
Being prepared for the worst has always been part of my job. However, “the worst” has devolved into horrors I had never imagined could be a reality when I walked into my first classroom nearly ten years ago. Each year, “the worst” seems to be more horrific than the last.
On Saturday, I will march in solidarity with students around the country as they, quite literally, fight for their lives. I will tell them that we don’t have all the answers, but I’ll assure them that we’re listening to the questions they’re asking. Together, we can all prepare to push for a return to a time where students feel safe enough to just learn and teachers feel safe enough to just teach.
March 10, 2018
Erie News Now
Candidate for Congress Makes Campaign Stop in Erie (link here).
Democratic candidate for Congress Chris Rieger made a campaign stop in Erie Saturday. Rieger, of Cranberry Township, is challenging Congressman Mike Kelly for the 16th District. It used to be the 3rd District before the congressional maps were redrawn.
Rieger said most of his support comes from Erie, and he wants to connect with voters here.
“People are anxious to see a new face, and with the way things are happening in Washington right now, they want to see a new Congress this November. Because they don’t like the direction things are going in, they don’t like efforts by our lawmakers to strip healthcare away from millions of Americans, the don’t like efforts by our lawmakers to remain complacent in the face of an administration that is threatening our institutions,” Rieger said.
Rieger tells Erie News Now he and his campaign will be spending he night of the primary in Erie.
March 3, 2018
Democrat Chris Rieger Holds Petition Signing Party
The man who hopes to unseat Congressman Mike Kelly was asking for the public’s support. Democrat Chris Rieger held a petition signing party today at the Whole Food Co-Op, collecting signatures to put him on the ballot. Rieger says voters have a unique opportunity this November to stop what he says has been a Congress trying to take healthcare away from millions of Americans.
“I believe healthcare is a fundamental human right and if you work full time you should not have to worry about being in poverty, not paying your medical bills and supporting yourself and your family so, that’s the message we’re trying to get out in Erie, Erie County and the rest of the 16th district,”said Rieger.
Rieger says he’s a consumer protection advocate that the purpose of public service is to help people.
January 29, 2018
Face to face with the candidates
Excitement was high as at least a hundred people filled into a room at My Brother’s Place restaurant in Springfield Township, taking chairs and standing along the walls when seats and space ran out. But the crowds weren’t there for Sunday brunch. They were attending the Third Congressional District 2018 Candidate Forum, where the public was able to submit questions to Dr. Robert Multari of Farrell, Brian Skibo of Hermitage and Chris Rieger of Cranberry Township, Butler County. The three Democrats are seeking the nomination to run against U.S. Rep. Mike Kelly, a four-term Republican incumbent from Butler County. Kelly was unopposed for re-election in 2016.
As the candidates were each given three minutes to answer questions, they were asked about topics ranging from health care to bringing jobs to the community to gun control.
“Whoever you vote for, I’d like to think any three of us on our worst day are better than Mike Kelly on his best day,” Rieger said.
Rieger received a bachelor’s degree from the University of Pittsburgh and a law degree from Duquesne University. He maintains a small law firm on the South Side of Pittsburgh. At his practice, Rieger said he sees people’s difficulties first-hand.
“Three out of four of my clients, not just for me but nationally, are entering bankruptcy because they were hurt on the job or had unpaid medical bills and racked up a lot of credit card debt,” Rieger said. “I think the issue could be solved if there was only one risk pool and a single-payer system.”
For Skibo, the fight over healthcare is personal; he is in remission after being diagnosed with brain cancer in 2012. Having recently gone through the medical system himself, Skibo said he understands what many people are going through, especially those who may be struggling financially. One of the medications he was receiving while undergoing treatment would have cost him $2,000 per pill had it not been for his health insurance.
“Last year the American Health Care Act took away 41,400 health insurances plans in the Third District,” Skibo said.
Multari is a 1976 graduate of Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine and specializes in internal medicine and pain medicine, with over 30 years of practice in the medical field.
Among the issues he said can be addressed are bringing jobs to the Third District, which could put young people to work and potentially help with the opioid epidemic, and lessen unemployment by accessing the natural gas in Mercer County.
“We have gas leases all over Mercer County. We can get companies to start extracting the gas, and we’re one of the best areas at making pipe and tube,” Multari said.
Among those in attendance was Richard Juel of Cranberry, who said his main reason for coming to the forum was to oppose Kelly. In particular, Juel said he appreciated the chance for the public to meet and ask the candidates questions, something he said Kelly has been lacking.
“Kelly refused to meet with his constituents in a public forum for three years. When he does speak, you don’t get to question and it’s highly controlled. It’s a monologue, not a dialogue,” Juel said.
Fellow attendee Rose Bayer of New Castle was previously involved in the presidential campaigns for Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton. After taking some time off for health reasons, Bayer said Sunday’s forum was the first time she returned to politics and said she was glad to hear what the candidates had to say.
“I thought it was great. I particularly liked what the attorney had to say,” Bayer said, referring to Rieger.
There was also the issue of the court-ordered redrawing of Pennsylvania’s congressional districts, which may interfere with the election. All of the candidates said a possible redistricting could interfere with the election, but Skibo said if the Third District was redrawn, he would make sure to campaign for whichever district his home county remains in.
“You can run for congressional district, but you don’t have to be born in the district. So you can have people running who don’t have a deep understanding of the district,” Skibo said.
The event was organized by 3rd District United, a network of grassroots groups and Democratic organizations from the district. Its next forum for Democratic congressional candidates will be from 1 to 3 p.m. Feb. 17 in the Sharon Municipal Building, 155 W. Connelly Blvd., Sharon.
January 24, 2018
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: Rieger Endorses ‘Fair Districts PA’
Prior to announcing my run for Congress in Pennsylvania’s Third District, I was involved with ‘Fair Districts PA,’ a nonpartisan organization dedicated to reforming how our legislative and congressional districts are drawn here in the Commonwealth.
The decision of our state Supreme Court earlier this week is no doubt a victory for the voters of this state. Notwithstanding the Court’s decision, however, permanent reform is still needed. ‘Fair Districts PA’ is still working tirelessly to amend our state constitution to remove politicians from the redistricting process. Putting the job in the hands of a nonpartisan citizens commission will ensure more competitive elections, more effective government, and far less of the polarization that has crippled our democracy.
Even though I am no longer affiliated with ‘Fair Districts PA’ because of my current candidacy for public office, I wholeheartedly endorse their mission.
Candidate for Congress, PA’s 3rd District
January 23, 2018
State’s Congressional districts ruled unconstitutional
By Matthew Rink
A Pennsylvania Supreme Court order Monday could dramatically alter the 2018 Congressional elections in Erie County and beyond.
The court, in a split decision, found that the map drawn by Republican lawmakers in 2011, following the 2010 Census, “clearly, plainly and palpably violates” the state Constitution. The Republican-controlled General Assembly has until Feb. 9 to submit a new map to Gov. Tom Wolf if it so chooses. If Wolf, a Democrat, finds the new map acceptable, he would have until Feb. 15 to submit it to the court. If that doesn’t occur, the court “shall proceed expeditiously to adopt a plan” of its own ahead of the May 15 primary.
Republicans said they plan to ask the U.S. Supreme Court for a stay.
The ruling could have major implications for the re-election campaigns of U.S. Reps. Mike Kelly, of Butler, R-3rd Dist., and U.S. Rep. Glenn Thompson, of Howard Township, R-5th Dist., who each represent portions of Erie County. The current map splits Erie County into two House districts.
The Pennsylvania League of Women Voters and residents of each of the state’s 18 Congressional districts brought the suit in June, claiming that the map approved by the Pennsylvania Senate in December 2011 was gerrymandered to favor the Republican Party. The map, the suit claimed, was drawn behind closed doors and with little to no input from Democratic lawmakers.
The lawsuit claims the map packed as many Democratic voters as possible into five districts, while spreading the rest into 13 other districts with Republican majorities.
Currently, Republicans hold 13 of the 18 House seats, despite there being more registered Democrats in the state.
Republican leaders in the state Senate said they are considering asking the U.S. Supreme Court to stay the state Supreme Court’s order.
“The Commonwealth’s Supreme Court moved with a hasty ruling that will only serve to cause a great deal of uncertainty for Pennsylvania’s voters,” Renee Gamela, a spokeswoman for Thompson said in a statement. “The Congressman stands on his record and looks forward to continuing to represent his constituents as this is worked out in the courts.”
Kelly’s office referred to a joint statement by Pennsylvania’s Republican Congressional delegation:
″(Monday’s) misguided decision by the Pennsylvania State Supreme Court is an unfortunate example of the judicial branch inserting itself into the core functions of the legislative branch. Today’s congressional maps were drafted and approved by both Republicans and Democrats. It also comes on the eve of a midterm election. An orderly electoral process is an essential function of our democracy.”
Wolf said Monday: “I strongly believe that gerrymandering is wrong and consistently have stated that the current maps are unfair to Pennsylvanians. My administration is reviewing the order and we are assessing the executive branch’s next steps in this process.”
To comply with the order, any plan submitted to the court must include districts that are “composed of compact and contiguous territory; as nearly equal in population as practicable; and which do not divide any county, city, incorporated town, borough, township, or ward, except where necessary to ensure equality of population.”
READ THE FULL STORY HERE.
Erie At Large: January 3, 2018
THE ERIE READER
By Jim Wertz
In the wake of the 2016 presidential elections, Democrats, in particular, focused their attention toward the 2018 midterm elections. Their hope: to make 2018 a change year on par with the three most recent midterm elections.
In 2006, Democrats gained 31 seats in the House and six seats in the Senate. Four years later, Republicans picked up 63 seats in the House and took back the six Senatorial seats lost in 2006; and in 2014, Republicans added 13 more seats in House and nine more seats in the Senate.
These swings are largely seen as electoral backlash toward the party which holds, and the President who resides in, the White House. Historically, since World War II, the party in power in the executive branch loses 25 seats, on average, in the House of Representatives as a result of Congressional midterm elections, according to analysis by Vox Media. In fact, the president’s party has lost Congressional seats in 16 of the last 18 midterm elections.
Pennsylvania Democrats would like to see this trend continue in 2018 as they search for a candidate that is both wonkish and charismatic enough to take on Republican Representative Mike Kelly, who was first elected to Congress in the change wave in 2010 unseating then Congresswoman Kathy Dahlkemper.
Chris Rieger hopes to be that candidate. He’s a 33-year old lawyer from south Butler County hoping he can convince voters that he can preserve what’s left of the Democratic agenda in Washington to the benefit of the rather homogenous and sprawling 3rd Congressional District, which includes western Erie County, as well as parts of Armstrong, Butler, Clarion, Crawford, Lawrence, and Mercer counties….
READ THE FULL INTERVIEW HERE.
Will the 3rd Still Be the 3rd?
November 20, 2017
Shortly after last November’s election, I received a call from a friend who had run for state house in Allegheny County. He asked me to be a speaker for the non-partisan group Fair Districts PA, an organization that is still attempting to reform how our congressional and legislative districts are drawn. I enthusiastically jumped at the opportunity, and did a few speaking engagements in Butler and Lawrence Counties before I decided to run for Congress.
Gerrymandering, the practice of drawing electoral districts to benefit one particular party or group, remains one of the most serious ailments of our democracy, and our own Commonwealth has been infected with the disease for quite some time, much more so than most other states. Pennsylvania is consistently ranked as one of the most gerrymandered states in the nation. It has its own share of egregious district boundaries, and our own Third District here in Western and Northwestern Pennsylvania is no exception. Prior to the 2010-2011 redistricting, Pennsylvania’s 3rd District lumped in all of Erie County and stretched into the northern areas of Butler County. It was typically represented by centrist Republicans in the mold of Tom Ridge and Phil English, and the district even turned blue when Kathy Dahlkemper pulled an upset of English in 2008.
But after the 2011 redistricting became finalized (and after litigation surrounding the map was resolved in 2013), the district became fragmented and distorted. The lines moved further south and included the rest of Butler County. It stretched eastward and included all of Armstrong County and the southernmost areas of Clarion County. But most notable, reliably blue Erie County became chopped in half, splitting the Erie County vote between the newly drawn 3rd and 5th districts.
This happened all over our state, and the results are obvious: notwithstanding a voter registration advantage of nearly one million for Democrats in Pennsylvania, and obtaining a majority of the votes cast for all congressional candidates, the Republican Party enjoys a staggering 13 to 5 advantage in its U.S. House seats for Pennsylvania. This in a state where voters still often split their ticket for statewide office, making Pennsylvania a true swing state.
Now, a glimmer of hope exists for those who wish to restore choice in democracy back to the voters. A lawsuit recently filed in state Commonwealth Court is seeking to overturn the 2011 scribble that is our congressional maps, and have them redrawn to better reflect the communities and voting patterns of our state. Just a couple weeks ago, the state Supreme Court ordered the lawsuit to proceed, and the Court will be trying the case on December 11. It has to submit its findings to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court by the end of the year.
How the Court will rule, and whether the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania will take it on appeal, is anyone’s guess. But if the maps are ordered to be redrawn, it could have serious ramifications on the 2018 races, including our own. Here is a possible map that could (emphasis on COULD) reflect what might happen for the midterms next year (scroll down to the middle of the page). Notice how on the hypothetical map that the rest of Erie County rejoins the district, and all of Lawrence County (including Ellwood City) is included. Additionally, south Butler County (Cranberry, Mars, Seven Fields, etc.) joins the 12th District in order to lump in similar communities (the affluent suburbs of Butler County and Northern Allegheny County, for instance).
Again, this is all speculation. For now. But if the Courts order that the maps need to be redrawn, that could go a long way toward restoring the voices of thousands across the state and our district. There is a saying about gerrymandering: “Voters should choose their elected representatives, not the other way around.”
Getting Money Out of Politics: One Tragic Example
October 20, 2017
One of the 3 primary pieces of our platform that I haven’t discussed as much as (but certainly no less important) is the need to reform our campaign finance system. That is, the need not just to overrule the Citizens United Supreme Court decision, but to remove private financing from our elections altogether.
Just one painful example of how our elections system has failed the American people (and in some cases, cost lives) was broken earlier this week by the Washington Post (see full story here). The Washington Post and “60 Minutes” highlighted how Congress, under intense lobbying from the drug and pharmaceutical industry, severely weakened the Drug Enforcement Agency’s ability to curb the spread of suspicious drug shipments to over-prescribing doctors and the black market. This has further fed a tragic opioid epidemic that has spread through the nation, including communities in Butler, Mercer, Erie counties, and all throughout the 3rd District.
By the time of the law’s passage in April 2016, the opioid scourge had claimed 200,000 lives, “more than 3 times the number of U.S. Military deaths in the Vietnam War.”
Between 2014 and 2016, the drug industry had contributed over $102 million lobbying Congress to pass the bill. During this time, Representative Mike Kelly received $149,000 in contributions from the industry. In the last quarter, he received $10,000 from Express Scripts, Inc. and Eli Lilly.
MEDICARE FOR ALL: IF NOT NOW, WHEN?
September 28, 2017
In politics, there is often a danger of interpreting short term victories as long-term, permanent shifts in policy. The most recent example came at the end of September, as the United States Senate’s attempts to repeal the Affordable Care Act and replace it with an immoral setup of block grants, Medicaid cuts, and stripping away of protections for those with pre-existing conditions came up empty yet again thanks to a few Republican senators (not to mention every single Democratic senator who held the line).
The event was framed, however, as a “last gasp” attempt at replacing former President Obama’s signature domestic legislation, as the time during this budget season to avoid the filibuster rules of the Senate had come and gone. This misses the point that the next budget battle can allow Congressional Republicans to recharge the batteries, and revive their attempts at ripping away health insurance for twenty or more million Americans.
This similar thinking arose for Democrats when the Affordable Care Act was passed in the early spring of 2010. It was (and still is) a landmark, but flawed, piece of legislation that politically was thought to put the issue of health care on the backburner for years and years. And that would certainly have been the case, but the Republicans’ illogical and immoral push for the better part of a decade to repeal the law has ironically brought the issue of health care as a right back to center stage.
Now that these attempts have come up empty, support for universal coverage in America is at an all-time high. Those who suggest we should “improve” the Affordable Care Act, but stop short of proposing some sort of expanded Medicare arrangement, miss the political danger in doing so. If Obamacare was marginally improved with, for instance, expanded subsidies for the private exchanges and other half measures, the issue of health care then becomes politically weak for years, as Congress will have much less of an incentive to work toward real reform. The system is made better, of course, but it would fail to address the issues of still having over twenty million Americans without coverage, onerous premiums and high deductibles for working families, and the continued stranglehold insurance and pharmaceutical companies have on our health and democracy.
Medicare has a seventy-five percent approval rating with the American people. In an age where Americans have difficulty agreeing what day of the week it is, the 52-year-old program for our seniors remains one of our country’s greatest and most popular domestic achievements. Expanding it to every American citizen is morally the right thing to do, but now the timing is on the American people’s side as well.
WHY I’M RUNNING
September 8, 2017
Among the old and worn carpet, pale yellow paint, and stacks upon stacks of files lining the walls of Just Harvest’s South Side location, you’ll find some of the most devoted, upbeat, and driven public servants in western Pennsylvania. I say “public servants” rather than “politicians,” because these volunteers are of course not elected officials. Not part of any state or federal bureaucracy. They are professionals, retirees, and college students. And they indeed serve the public in the most basic and fundamental sense of that often overused phrase.
Just Harvest is one of a few dozen or so locations in Western Pennsylvania that works with the United Way to provide free tax preparation to low income and elderly citizens from every January until April 15. Volunteers must become certified by the Internal Revenue Service either at a “Basic” (wage income) or “Advanced” (self-employed) level, and have to take hours of coursework every fall in order to do so.
When I first volunteered in the program a few years ago, it was daunting at first. As a practicing bankruptcy attorney, I had some experience in tax law (you don’t have to be a lawyer to participate in the program, of course), but the hustle and bustle among the cubicles of my site was a far cry from the quiet, steady environment of my law office down on the other end of Carson Street.
But a larger reason for the hectic atmosphere is the stakes involved. These are working men and women sitting down with you to get their taxes done. Many of them single parents, struggling to pay rent and provide food for their children. And the money they receive from taking advantage of the Earned Income Tax Credit, the country’s largest anti-poverty program, goes to three or four months of rent. Or pays for nearly a year’s worth of childcare. Or goes to increasing tuition and book expenses for a newly admitted student at Butler County Community College. Other times, it’s a retiree whose only source of income is Social Security, who needs to apply for a property tax rebate for the year. No matter the case, these people are depending on you to deliver a service. And it’s a service that helps
people live their lives.
My passion for public service probably began with my father. For thirty years he taught English literature at Altoona Area High School, and ran a children’s theater program at Penn State Altoona during the summer. His commitment to his students over the years, coupled with my mother’s work ethic and resiliency (she has worked in sales at a jewelry store for nearly 25 years), helped create a feeling in me that individuals have a moral and civic obligation to make the world around them better, however possible, if they have the means to do so. I tried keeping that thought buried in my head when I went through law school at Duquesne University, and then into private practice. I hadn’t initially thought bankruptcy and consumer protection law would appeal to me. Employment discrimination or perhaps labor law seemed a more appropriate avenue (my father had exited the public school system in rather acrimonious fashion, and his experiences had inspired me to try my hand in that field). But my first clerking job (which eventually became my first, and to this day only, legal job at the same firm) introduced me to issues of income inequality, loss of job, child support payments, and most importantly, medical debt. Family after family rolling through my office left in near financial ruin, through no fault of their own, drove me to do the best possible good for them, to help put them back on their feet. And often times, I also had to play the role of “encourager,” to let people know that this whole process was “hitting the reset button,” as I often say, so that they could finally right their ship and get on with their lives.
At some point (I still don’t know the precise day), I decided I wanted to keep doing the same things I already was doing, but simply on a larger scale. This ultimately led me into the hustle and bustle of Just Harvest’s location near Station Square. And it now leads me to try and lend a helping hand in an even larger forum, the United States Congress. The principles are the same – lifting families up, encouraging individuals always to look toward a brighter day, helping people – only now you’re working with a clientele of not hundreds, but hundreds of thousands. Congress has taken a beating in public opinion over the years, and rightfully so, for its actions (or inaction) on any number of issues. But every once in awhile, a funny thing happens in the halls of the Capitol Building: democracy works. Social Security, the National Labor Relations Act, Medicare, Medicaid, the Civil Rights Act, the Voting Rights Act, equal pay, revitalization of the American auto industry, the Affordable Care Act. Regardless of the state of our nation’s capital right now, that is a resume of which to be proud. And true public servants have a natural desire to add to it. As Americans, complacency is not in our vocabulary. We always strive not just to do better, but to do good. That is why I am running.
NEW CASTLE NEWS
Lawrence County Action holds monthly meeting
September 1, 2017
Lawrence County Action held its monthly meeting Aug. 28 at the New Castle Public Library.
The program included information on committee person training, getting out the vote, fair districts and the judges tour. The group also heard from Chris Rieger, who will be challenging Mike Kelly in the Pennsylvania 3rd District race as well as Robert Lyles, who is a candidate for the New Castle Area School District Board of Directors.
Kathy Rentz opened the meeting by welcoming new faces in the crowd of 30 plus in attendance. She gave an overview of the committee person training attended by some members, and the group discussed various ways to contact voters. She stressed that there wasn’t much time to get this done before the November election. Sandra Moore talked about the letters she sent out to her precinct and the responses she received. Dick Craig suggested knocking on doors in neighborhoods. He said knowing our message and listening to the responses and concerns was vitally important. He also talked about getting palm cards and how we could use them. Linda Morrison distributed voter registration cards for members to carry with them to pass out whenever able to do so.
The upcoming Western PA Judicial Candidates Tour was announced. This is an opportunity to hear from the eight democratic candidates on the ballot in November for the courts of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. It will be held on Saturday, Sept. 16 at 9 a.m. at The Confluence in downtown New Castle. The event is free and open to the public.
Kathy then introduced Rieger. “We are running a positive, progressive, economic message in the district, stressing issues that are important to working Americans in areas like ours – rural and suburban,” Rieger said. “And I would say we as a party have to get back to those roots, because we do have a resume that we can be proud of such as SS, labor relations, Medicare, civil and voting rights, the Peace Corps, and the Paris Climate Accord.”
Robert Lyles spoke of being born and raised in New Castle and that his children attend the city schools. He is running because he wants to insure that his children, as well as all children attending the NCASD, receive the education and mentoring he did. “I will be fiscally responsible with your tax dollars and work to ensure that every child has the resources to reach their God-given potential,” Lyles said.
The meeting closed with information from Betsy Demarest about Fair Districts PA and the bills currently in the legislature pertaining to gerrymandering. Presentations are planned for Sept. 19 at 6 p.m. at the New Castle Public Library and Sept. 26 at the Ellwood City Library at 6 p.m. The community is invited to these bipartisan events to learn how gerrymandering affects our elections and how we can change this unfair process.